Huntingdon
College | Political Science | FOIA
| FRAMP project | Internet
Effect | Terrorism Index
| What's New?
PSC
371: World Politics and Terrorism
Outline by Adam Farquhar, April 2005
Arend, Anthony Clark. 1998. "Terrorism and Just War Doctrine." Terrorism
and Counter Terrorism. 7(3): 345-354.
I. Part I: Ius ad Bellum and Terrorism
-
What factors make a war just as compared to the classic authors, such as
Aristotle and Plato?
-
War must be initiated by a competent authority figure.
-
The war must have a just cause with some sustenance to the cause and be
able to be compared to other situations.
-
The state must have the right intention, ever thought this can be complicated.
-
War should be the last resort of a nation that has exhausted all of its
diplomatic options.
-
There should be a goal probability or success.
-
The cost of the war should not out way the good that has come of it.
II. Part II: Ius in Bello and Terrorism
-
War must also follow the criteria for Ius in Bello.
-
Proportionality means that the mean of the war must be equal to the ends.
-
A state should not attack non-enemy components such as women and children.
III. Part III: Terrorism and Just War Recommendations
-
The principles of Ius and Bellum
1. There must be competent authority.
2. There has to be a just cause.
3. There has to be a right intention.
4. It has to be a last resort.
5. There should be a good probability for success.
-
The principles of Ius in Bello
-
One shouldn’t use the ‘eye for eye’ justice when dealing with terrorism.
-
Discrimination is very difficult when you can’t tell the terrorists from
the civilians.